|
ISSUE 28 November 11, 2004
   |
|
|
|
|
PPO Discount Dispute Ruled Unrelated
to ERISA
Often, medical
providers end up agreeing to larger discounts than they
hoped to negotiate. This problem is compounded when
the managed care plans you participate with frequently
employ unfair denial and delay tactics. However, the managed
care contract seems to contain many protections making it
hard for medical providers to appeal or litigate poor claim
payment performance on the part of the insurance carriers.
Read this entire article for
a discussion of recent cases beneficial to providers who
find themselves contemplating litigation over a managed care
breach of contract. |
 |
December Audioconference on Appeals
Your last chance this year
for getting your staff trained for appeals is coming up
December 16.
Appeals – When “Limitations and Exclusions Apply”
Isn’t Good Enough is a
90-minute audioconference featuring information on asserting
your rights when insurers provide canned denials. Tammy
Tipton, President of Appeal Solutions, will discuss what
laws apply to appeal review and how to use them in your
favor to obtain such pertinent details as the credentials of
the reviewer and the documentation in the claim file or
policy which support the denial.
A number of Level II
appeal letters will be presented and discussed at length.
Appeal Solutions is adding a number of Level II appeals to
the AppealLettersOnline.com database to assist members with
ensuring that the denial is looked at by different personnel
at different levels within the insurance company.
Over 95% of
past attendees have said that their facility benefited from
this audioconference and that they would be implementing
several of the techniques and appeal letters presented
during the audioconference.
The live audio conference will be held Thursday Dec. 16th at 11 a.m.
CST. Cost is $197 per dial in line. Purchase one
line and train your entire office staff on appeals.
The audioconference is also available on CD-Rom.
Click here for details... or call 888-399-4925. |
 |
New Feature at AppealLettersOnline.com
AppealLettersOnline.com now has a feature to allow users to
pull up only letters specific to their state. The “Select
Letters By State” option appears on the appeal letter
repository page beneath the subcategory selection. Selecting
this option allows you to select your state and then view
both general appeal letters and state-specific appeal
letters for your state......sign
up for access
to the appeal letter repository |
 |
New Letter to Assist With Payments Not
In Compliance With Contractual Terms
We have added a new letter to
the AppealLettersOnline.com Repository regarding failure to
pay according to contractual terms. The letter is located in
the Topic “Benefit Reductions” under the “Miscellaneous”
Category under the letter title “Payment Not In Compliance
With Contract.” The letter assists providers with citing
information directly from the contract and also asks the
carrier to respond with detailed information regarding what
portion of the contract was used to calculate the received
payment. The letter also states that since
managed care
contracts are contracts of adhesion, the organization
responsible for drafting the contract wording can be
responsible for unclear and ambiguous terms. |
 |
Specialty Highlight:
The
AppealLettersOnline User forum recently featured a
discussion of payment Code
G0289, "Arthroscopy, knee, surgical, for removal of loose
body, foreign body, debridement/shaving of articular
cartilage (chrondroplasty) at the time of other surgical
knee arthroscopy in a different compartment of the same
knee." CMS Program Memo A-02-129 addresses hospital
outpatient facility documentation requirements for G0289 and
states that this is a packaged service under OPPS and
that facilities will not receive additional payments for
this code. Additional money is paid for the professional fee
when G0289 is billed. The memorandum is located at
www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/pm_trans/A02129.pdf
and G0289 is addressed on pages 18-19.
We invite anyone having experience/advice on reimbursement
of this code to add to this discussion. |
|
|
|